Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers

This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement, and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the “equal weight view” to resolve disagreement among epistemic peers. We apply our...

متن کامل

A Proposal for Consensual Decision Making using Argumentation

We propose an approach where a consensual decision making in multiagent systems can be reached using argumentation, with dialogues inspired in the interaction among humans in presencial meetings. The goal of the study is to identify the main features needed to reach consensus, like speech acts that are necessary in a dialogue using argumentation and ways in which agents can accept or reject for...

متن کامل

Epistemic considerations of decision making in games

From the Ex Ante point of view, an axiomatization of decision making in a game with pure strategies is given, while considering its epistemic aspects in propositional game (epistemic) logic. Our axiomatization consists of four base axioms for predicted final decisions. One of them is an epistemic requirement, which together with the others leads to an infinite regress of the knowledge of these ...

متن کامل

Epistemic Foundation of Decision Making under Ambiguity

In the seminal works, Mukerji (1997) and Ghirardato (2001) explain the notion of ambiguity in terms of incompleteness of what the decision maker (DM) knows and demonstrate that such limitation may lead to a non-additive specification of DM’s beliefs. However, these theories do not relate this issue to well established formal models of knowledge. We show that translating the decision theoretic s...

متن کامل

Perception of peers' behaviour regarding sexual health decision making among female undergraduates in Anambra State, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND High-risk sexual behaviours are prevalent in tertiary educational institutions in Nigeria, but little is known about the social influences that bear on the reproductive health decision-making and behaviour of the undergraduates. On the other hand, perceptions regarding the behaviour and influence of peers have been documented to be key social factors associated with reproductive heal...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Episteme

سال: 2009

ISSN: 1742-3600,1750-0117

DOI: 10.3366/e1742360009000598